has been just introduced as new Covert Task hero:
10,366
pages
ALL POSTS
6
I'm really impressed at the number of people only looking forward for Shanna because of the way she looks.
If people continue to act like that, the stereotype of a woman being only sexual appeal in games or comics will never go away.
That is wrong. People should stop thinking and acting that way, because people who do that have as much brain as the dinosaurs Shanna faces.
We need some girls in this game and even in comics, movies, and everything else to represent that women are more than just treats for men's eyes.
Sure, some art may be a little provocative, but there are women out there stronger than a lot of men that show women aren't just toys.
Because the second someone writes "Beeeeewbs" on this Wiki, that shows we're going back to the Stone age.
(Edited by Leojsaad)
1
IronFrank wrote:
Holy sweetpie of sexappeal! Her artwork is very cool. Her sprite looks sexy too, but would be great to get her face look like her artwork, looks older like this, stil sexy.
Holy sweetpie of sexappeal! Her artwork is very cool. Her sprite looks sexy too, but would be great to get her face look like her artwork, looks older like this, stil sexy.
I´m in, let´s do this.
Do you see what I'm talking about?
(Edited by Leojsaad)
2
Leojsaad wrote:
I'm really impressed at the number of people only looking forward for Shanna because of the way she looks.
I'm really impressed at the number of people only looking forward for Shanna because of the way she looks.
If people continue to act like that, the stereotype of a woman being only sexual appeal in games or comics will never go away.
That is wrong. People should stop thinking and acting that way, because people who do that have as much brain as the dinosaurs Shanna faces.
We need some girls in this game and even in comics, movies, and everything else to represent that women are more than just treats for men's eyes.
Sure, some art may be a little provocative, but there are women out there stronger than a lot of men that show women aren't just toys.
Because the second someone writes "Beeeeewbs" on this Wiki, that shows we're going back to the Stone age.
You can't hide biology brother. Repressing emotions is far more damaging than expressing and offending a random person. Political discussions should be left for the classroom and during educational moments not during a videogame. I'm widly into politics before anybody says otherwise. I just know my audience.
(Edited by Rilic)
0
Rilic wrote:
You can't hide biology brother. Repressing emotions is far more damaging than expressing and offending a random person. Political discussions should be left for the classroom and during educational moments not during a videogame. I'm widly into politics before anybody says otherwise. I just know my audience.
Leojsaad wrote:
I'm really impressed at the number of people only looking forward for Shanna because of the way she looks.
I'm really impressed at the number of people only looking forward for Shanna because of the way she looks.
If people continue to act like that, the stereotype of a woman being only sexual appeal in games or comics will never go away.
That is wrong. People should stop thinking and acting that way, because people who do that have as much brain as the dinosaurs Shanna faces.
We need some girls in this game and even in comics, movies, and everything else to represent that women are more than just treats for men's eyes.
Sure, some art may be a little provocative, but there are women out there stronger than a lot of men that show women aren't just toys.
Because the second someone writes "Beeeeewbs" on this Wiki, that shows we're going back to the Stone age.
You can't hide biology brother. Repressing emotions is far more damaging than expressing and offending a random person. Political discussions should be left for the classroom and during educational moments not during a videogame. I'm widly into politics before anybody says otherwise. I just know my audience.
Well, when your "audience" is a bunch of sexist guys, it's kinda hard to make a point. And I don't think this is a huge political discussion. I was just expressing how pathetic it is to think of women as objects. Don't mix biology with sexism. There's a difference.
(Edited by Leojsaad)
1
I'm not going to even get into how widly political feminism is. Also a historically accurate depiction of a pre-historic women is barely sexist. Kazar wears nothing too and can be argued as female fan fiction. So it goes both ways. Lets get back to the game now
(Edited by Rilic)
Leojsaad wrote:
Well, when your "audience" is a bunch of sexist guys, it's kinda hard to make a point. And I don't think this is a huge political discussion. I was just expressing how pathetic it is to think of women as objects. Don't mix biology with sexism. There's a difference.
Well, when your "audience" is a bunch of sexist guys, it's kinda hard to make a point. And I don't think this is a huge political discussion. I was just expressing how pathetic it is to think of women as objects. Don't mix biology with sexism. There's a difference.
If Shanna were real, I would agree that reducing here to boobed eye candy would be sexism. This is not a human being. This is a drawing, meant to be looked at. It's not reductive to say "I find this drawing appealing", although it is a little odd, I'll grant. Scolding people for things like this only serves to ostracize them from your cause and marginalize you. If they were treating a contributor on the wiki this way, I would be on your side. In this case, a simple "that's immature" to myself and other commenters is probably enough.
(Edited by BrickTamland)
0
If I really have to hear people commenting about sexism is correct, then I'm leaving this thread right now so I don't have to read stuff like "Beeeeewbs" again. Goodbye to all.
(Edited by Leojsaad)
Man... if a beutiful girl (or a drawing of a beutiful girl) with few clothes showing her "goods" is Sexism,
then a male Peacock with beautiful colors, showing his feather patterns is Sexism too.
It's all about Biology.
(Edited by Luis Carnage)
1
I know! Let's argue about biology and women's rights on an unofficial wiki for a Facebook game!
(Edited by NcyRocks)
NcyRocks wrote:
I know! Let's argue about biology and women's rights on an unofficial wiki for a Facebook game!
I know! Let's argue about biology and women's rights on an unofficial wiki for a Facebook game!
Indeed... we should be arguing about what to argue on a topic on a wiki, while someone will argue about this total arguing we're having here. Some will even argue that's not arguing by the "prime principles" of arguing. Or we should argue that there are absolutely no principles to argue in arguing? Or arguing about that is really arguing? Or just arguing about something that's not even a valid argument to argue?
That's argueinception!
(Edited by Luis Carnage)